A few weeks ago, I met what would be a first for me: a girl who does not, nor has not, ever owned a television. While others have referred to her as a “hippie,” to me she is more of an idealist. It took me about 30 minutes of lengthy discussion to realize the benefits of this lifestyle, but once I moved past my, “How do you watch Grey’s Anatomy,” method of thinking, I began to see how truly advantageous this could be. No TV, she explained to me, means more time for catching up with family and friends, reading, cleaning and other household chores, more restful sleep, etc. In the event that there is that occasional show that you cannot miss, nowadays, most major network shows are available for free online, and movies can now be played from computers and laptops as well. What a phenomenal concept?!

I have found that in today’s fast-paced society, technology has made communication become more about convenience and ease of use then the “face to face” personal touch. I cannot even tell you how many times I will be sitting right next to, or across from a co-worker, and instead of momentarily looking up from their screen to talk to me, the “ping” me on AIM from a mere three feet away.

It is suggested that when give and take is required, personal communication is often best. A global survey administered to senior executives and managers showed that 67 percent feel their organization would be more productive if superiors communicated more often by personal discussion. (CIO.com) In the event that personal communication is not available, telephone or web conferencing is an acceptable second choice. E-mail is best for scheduling and confirming meetings, phone is best for quick two-way communications, and a memo is preferred for long background pieces. In-person meetings are always best for any discussion requiring true dialogue and consensus.